Guidance for Accepting Odonata Records

Any single hard and fast rule for accepting records of Odonata is counterproductive because a number of considerations can affect the reliability of a record. A voucher specimen is the "gold standard" in Odonatology and is always preferred, but a photograph may be sufficient in some cases and even sight records may be sufficient in others. The rule of thumb is that rare or unusual records require greater verification than more common records (exceptional records require exceptional verification).

A voucher specimen with an accurate date/location label is always the preferred standard:

Considerations that affect acceptance of photographic or sight records include:

Thus, a sight record for a new county record of a common species may be acceptable if:

However, a voucher may be required, if any of the above considerations are questionable.

For a highly exceptional record, we prefer irrefutable documentation of a breeding population with vouchers retained of all life stages with accurate date/location labels.

For a moderately exceptional record, we prefer a voucher specimen with an accurate date/location label but will accept a photograph if it is an easily identified species or possibly a sight record from an observer with solid credentials in identification.

For a record of low exceptionality, we prefer a voucher specimen with an accurate date/location label but will accept an identifiable photograph or a sight record from a reasonably competent observer.


This site is produced in conjunction with the Wisconsin Aquatic and Terrestrial Resources Inventory and sponsored by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and the Beaver Creek Reserve in cooperation with many partners. The information presented on this site is subject to the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources’ Legal Notices, Disclaimers, and Terms of Use.